Re: [patches] Fw: What license is acceptable for libdecnumber

[Jim Blandy <jimb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Ryan S. Arnold" <rsa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I agree.  We intend to incorporate the code in the existing overrides
> into the base files using conditionals.
>
> Jim do you want patches to the base files to accompany the initial
> libdfp patch or can we provide a patch at a later time to eliminate the
> overrides and add the conditionalized code to the base files?

The patches to the base files probably should be in the initial patch.
Exactly how the generic code adapts to DFP's presence and absence
would seem to me to be the most interesting thing to review.