[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patches] Re: eglibc-2.8 fails to link with OPTION_EGLIBC_LOCAL_CODE=n
- To: Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [patches] Re: eglibc-2.8 fails to link with OPTION_EGLIBC_LOCAL_CODE=n
- From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:24:10 -0500
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:45:32PM +0200, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:47:20PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> While building eglibc for powerpc, I encountered linking error
>>> when using the following option-groups.config:
>>>
>>> OPTION_EGLIBC_BSD = n
>>> OPTION_EGLIBC_CXX_TESTS = n
>>> OPTION_EGLIBC_CATGETS = n
>>> OPTION_EGLIBC_LOCALES = n
>>> OPTION_EGLIBC_LOCALE_CODE = n
>>> OPTION_EGLIBC_STREAMS = n
>>>
>>> The error is:
>>>
>>> /home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-build/libc_pic.os: In function `__dcigettext':
>>> /home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-2.8/libc/intl/dcigettext.c:749: undefined reference to `__libc_setlocale_lock'
>>> /home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-2.8/libc/intl/dcigettext.c:459: undefined reference to `__libc_setlocale_lock'
>>> /home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-2.8/libc/intl/dcigettext.c:635: undefined reference to `__libc_setlocale_lock'
>>> /usr/bin/ld: /home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-build/libc.so: hidden symbol `__libc_setlocale_lock' isn't defined
>>> /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output
>>> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>>> make[1]: *** [/home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-build/libc.so] Error 1
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/jwboyer/src/eglibc-2.8/libc'
>>> make: *** [all] Error 2
>>>
>>> If I simply set OPTION_EGLIBC_LOCALES_CODE=y, then it appears to
>>> build and link just fine. I haven't debugged it further yet, but
>>> it would seem the __libc_setlocale_lock code should probably be
>>> protected by an ifdef of some kind.
>>
>> The following patch allowed the build to complete. I haven't tested this
>> beyond building, and I'm not entirely sure this is the proper fix.
>>
>> Comments welcome.
>
> Josh,
>
> Thank you for the patch. Your patch seems fine, but I want to take a
> closer look at the issue to make sure that the problem will be fixed
> completely. I'll get back to you after I run some tests.
Any update here. It would be nice to have this fixed in the 2.8 branch.
josh