Re: [Patches] [PATCH] Fix symbol definitions of feraiseexcept for PPC e500

[Khem Raj <raj.khem@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 31/08/2012, at 11:10 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>
>>> 0000fe48 T feraiseexcept@@GLIBC_2.2
>>> 0000fe48 T feraiseexcept@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Those would only be right if previous e500 binaries provided those at
>> those versions; the ABI for e500 glibc is not the same as for non-e500.
>> (e500 could do with baselines for the ABI tests - which of course should
>> be checked against old binaries to make sure the contents of old symbol
>> versions are correct, just as was done when ABI baselines were set up for
>> various architectures for glibc 2.16.)
>>
>
> Previous e500 binaries didn't provide those.  I've checked in the following patch which only adds an internal alias to fix the build.
>

Looks good to me

> I will also backport this patch to 2.16 branch.
>

yes please

> --
> Maxim Kuvyrkov
> CodeSourcery / Mentor Graphics
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Patches mailing list
> Patches@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://eglibc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/patches
>
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
Patches@xxxxxxxxxx
http://eglibc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/patches