Re: [Patches] cross compiling eglibc

[Khem Raj <raj.khem@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Creating such symlinks is incorrect.  After my changes that went in just
> after 2.16 branched, it should be possible to build glibc using a
> static-only GCC; there should be no dependence of the build on libgcc_s
> and libgcc_eh.  But you need two libgcc patches of mine that only went in
> after GCC 4.7 branched in order for the glibc you get to be the same as
> you'd get when building with a full GCC (using shared libraries and with a
> previously built glibc).  So before GCC 4.8 you still need the three
> compilers to get the same results as you would get from a convergent
> iteration of building alternating GCC and glibc: the GCC providing the
> libgcc used when building glibc has itself to have been built with shared
> libraries enabled (so the correct symbols are hidden) and without
> inhibit_libc (so crt*.o are correctly configured for exception handling).

can you post the links for these libgcc patches
can these libgcc patches be backported to 4.7
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
Patches@xxxxxxxxxx
http://eglibc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/patches