[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Patches] [PATCH] ARM: NEON detected memcpy.
- To: "Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars)" <sylee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [Patches] [PATCH] ARM: NEON detected memcpy.
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:02:06 +0000
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> I know there is some legal homework but I don't know how to do it.
> Could you provide more details about how to put such copyright
> assignment (with some real example is better)?
See
<http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Papers.html>. To
use anything based on the 2009 work, either Nokia will need to complete a
corporate copyright assignment for that work, if it is copyright Nokia
pursuant to whatever employment contract Siarhei Siamashka had with Nokia
at the time, or Nokia will need to complete an employer disclaimer and
Siarhei Siamashka will need to complete an individual assignment. And the
same applies for anyone else who has made significant contributions to the
code.
> About raised power consumption and context switch costs, I may be able
> to add some option in configure for the users to decide if they want
> to use this feature or not.
> How do you think?
I suggest raising such a question of configure options for such trade-offs
more generally on libc-alpha.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Patches mailing list
Patches@xxxxxxxxxx
http://eglibc.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/patches