Re: [patches] powerpc 8xx dcbz problem

[Steven Munroe <munroesj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Steven Munroe wrote:
>
>   
>> So yes the one time check in libc-start.c does not hurt your situation.
>> The dynamic __cache_line_size hurts my situation by its very existience.
>> So please don't assume that you can add dynamic tuning anywhere you want
>> or anytime you want. Becuase while you may solve your problem you will
>> invariable harm someone elses situation.
>>     
>
> OK, I think we understand that.  But, do you have any objection to
> making the particular 8xx change that we want to make?  Then, if someone
> wants to eliminate the pre-existing dynamic check, they can do that in
> future.
>
>   
No objections to the proposed patch at this time.