[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patches] PowerPC fesetexceptflag fixes
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [patches] PowerPC fesetexceptflag fixes
- From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 17:59:32 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The e500 and -msoft-float versions of fesetexceptflag set the state
> of all exceptions. They're supposed to leave the state of other
> exceptions alone, based on the text in C99. While I was there I
> updated some of the functions which should raise (or should not raise)
> exceptions to match my understanding of the language standard. I
> don't know of anything that tests whether these functions raise
> signals in particular conditions, though.
>
> Does this look OK to commit? If so I'd like to apply it everywhere
> (that's trunk, 2.6, 2.5, and FSF libc-ports).
It looks reasonable to me, but I'd like Steven to review it.
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx