Re: [patches] PowerPC fesetexceptflag fixes

[Steven Munroe <munroesj@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
>   
>> The e500 and -msoft-float versions of fesetexceptflag set the state
>> of all exceptions.  They're supposed to leave the state of other
>> exceptions alone, based on the text in C99.  While I was there I
>> updated some of the functions which should raise (or should not raise)
>> exceptions to match my understanding of the language standard.  I
>> don't know of anything that tests whether these functions raise
>> signals in particular conditions, though.
>>
>> Does this look OK to commit?  If so I'd like to apply it everywhere
>> (that's trunk, 2.6, 2.5, and FSF libc-ports).
>>     
>
> It looks reasonable to me, but I'd like Steven to review it.
>   
Looks OK to me.